406 vs 407

Discussion in 'Peugeot 406' started by Francis Rouillet, Apr 14, 2005.

  1. What do you think ?
     
    Francis Rouillet, Apr 14, 2005
    #1
  2. Francis Rouillet

    Johny H Guest

    jury is still out. That front looks like a sting ray out of the water.
     
    Johny H, Apr 14, 2005
    #2
  3. Francis Rouillet

    mindwipe Guest

    they look brill
     
    mindwipe, Apr 14, 2005
    #3
  4. Francis Rouillet

    Androo Guest

    The press thought the 406 was a stunning new car when it was launched. It
    set new standards in all sorts of areas. It was refined, rode well, handled
    brilliantly and looked superb. It still is and does.
    The 407 improves on the lacklustre interior and poor crash safety of the
    406. But by all accounts it doesn't ride as well. And where the 406 is
    svelte, well proportioned and timeless, the 407 is all clumsy overhangs and
    cartoon swoops. It's definitely a case of form over function, especially
    since that long snout didn't reap any rewards in terms of pedestrian safety
    like it was supposed to. And have you seen the coupé? Looks like a Pontiac
    or a Buick, and when you think how beautiful the 406 coupé is...
    The 406 was way ahead of its rivals on launch. The 407 is already behind its
    rivals. Peugeot is off the pace at the moment for sure.

    Androo
     
    Androo, Apr 15, 2005
    #4
  5. Francis Rouillet

    Martin Dixon Guest

    In message <>
    As a 407 owner I disagree. Never had a 406, by previous car was a 306. But
    the 407 is the first car in its class that I have driven that is a better
    drive than a Mondeo (at least with the Hdi 136).

    Compared to the 407, the 306 feels like driving a tractor. My only
    disappointment with the 407 has been fuel consumption, which has been
    consistently been about 10mpg less than I expected, But today I drove from
    Leicester to Peterborough and back (about 80 miles) with the climate control
    off and didnt reset the trip computer till I got clear of Leicester and its
    traffic lights. I got 44mpg, which is a lot better than the average of 37
    that I was getting.

    The 407 handles superbly and goes well, even if you can almost see the fuel
    gauge dropping if you use the performance. But I suspect the 406 was the
    same in this respect.

    I had a ride in a 406 airport taxi recently, and the driver said he could get
    46mpg from the HDI engine, but nearly all his driving was on motorways at a
    constant 70mph. BNasically he drove very gently, and I think you need to do
    the same with the 407 to get good fuel consumption.

    Martin
     
    Martin Dixon, Apr 17, 2005
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.