cam belt broken to early?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by lenny, Aug 2, 2008.

  1. lenny

    lenny Guest

    Hi,
    My cam belt broke and caused £1500 worth of damage 2 months after I bought
    the car privately. The car had done 90000 but the recommended change is at
    144000. The car has been serviced by a Peugeot dealer since new (Until I
    purchased it) and it ran out of warranty in November last year. Should I
    contact Peugeot about this or will they not cover this damage? The garage
    that has repaired the car believe that the belt breaking caused all the
    damage, not something else damaging the belt first.

    2004 307SW 1.6HDi

    Lenny
     
    lenny, Aug 2, 2008
    #1
  2. lenny

    Michael Shaw Guest

    Hello,

    Just my personal opinion, but I have always changed the cambelt, idler and
    tensioner avery 20000 miles, maybe execessive, but with each engine and
    manufacturer specifying anything between 36000 and 80000 etc, i like to play
    safe.
     
    Michael Shaw, Aug 3, 2008
    #2
  3. lenny

    Michael Shaw Guest

    Also, the cambelt should really have been in the list of things to do when
    you first bought the car.
     
    Michael Shaw, Aug 3, 2008
    #3
  4. lenny

    Ken Guest

    It would probably be worthwhile tackling Peugeot. There was an early
    problem with my 505 which required replacing the wet sleeves and
    pistons. Apparently it was a fault in the seals. It was outside the
    warranty period but they finally met most of the costs. If there is
    good reason to think that the fault was caused by an error in design/
    manufacture then in most countries the manufacturer is liable for ever
    (though the cost of litigation usually makes this not much more than a
    technicality). Most countries have government agencies which try to
    enforce the legal principle (which is that all goods sold must be of
    merchantable quality - which means that they are reasonably suitable
    for the purpose for which they are sold). And manufacturers are
    increasingly aware of the opportunity offered by channels such as this
    newsgroup (or the other one ending in 'sucks') and the press to
    publicise bad experiences. The 'warranty period' does not limit the
    seller's obligations under the law.
    On the other hand, the fact that the failure occurred at 90k, rather
    than, say, at 2k, raises a distinct possibility that the failure was
    due to something other than bad design/manufacture. But maybe still
    worth a try.
     
    Ken, Aug 8, 2008
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.