Why do petrol cars have vacuum pumps?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by -, Aug 1, 2004.

  1. -

    - Guest

    My Citroen Xsara VTS (cf. Peugeot 306 Gti) has an exaust cam driven
    vacuum pump betwixt inlet manifold and servo. I can't see how a
    situation could arise where there was insufficient vacuum unless you
    drove foot-flat to the floor and controlled your speed purely with the
    brake.

    From the Pierburg site:

    " Especially diesel vehicles, but also more and more vehicles with
    petrol engines are being equipped with vacuum pumps from Pierburg, which
    supply the necessary vacuum for supporting the brake system at the right
    time.

    Moreover, vacuum pumps are used in connection with the central locking
    system, air conditioning system, automatic transmission, emission
    control system and other control components."

    Well the latter reasons are certainly red-herrings as my car doesn't
    appear to have taps from the vacuum line at all, indeed the thought of
    tapping the vacuum lines for the sake of central locking would seem
    perverse. Pneumatic door locks have always been Heath-Robinsonesque at
    best IMO.

    Intrigued,

    Thomas Hood
     
    -, Aug 1, 2004
    #1
  2. -

    JazzMan Guest

    Vacuum can be insufficient to meet the needs of the car
    under certain circumstances, and the amount of vacuum
    capacity available may also not be enough under certain
    circumstances. If the car has an aggressive camshaft or
    has a very small engine, combined with vacuum driven
    accessories that "consume" lots of vacuum then a pump
    may be necessary. The engineers make that decision based
    upon a comprehensive analysis when designing the car.

    JazzMan
    --
    **********************************************************
    Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net.
    Curse those darned bulk e-mailers!
    **********************************************************
    "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of
    supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to
    live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry
    **********************************************************
     
    JazzMan, Aug 1, 2004
    #2
  3. -

    Dick C Guest

    JazzMan wrote in rec.autos.tech
    An extreme case was a 63 rambler that I had. It had vacuum operated
    windshield wipers. Driving on a flat surface at a steady speed and
    they worked fine, going down hill could get them flying. Accelerating
    up a hill would almost stop them.
    Many cars also use vacuum assisted power brakes, and the concern might
    be that the vacum from the engine would not be enough to make that
    work.

    --
    Dick #1349
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    ~Benjamin Franklin

    Home Page: dickcr.iwarp.com
    email:
     
    Dick C, Aug 2, 2004
    #3
  4. You don't tend to accelerate up a hill and use brakes at the same time...
    Vacuum is at its greatest on a closed throttle - ideal situation for
    brakes.
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Aug 2, 2004
    #4
  5. -

    Dick C Guest

    Dave Plowman (News) wrote in rec.autos.tech
    You're right. However, the brakes do take quite a bit of vacum,
    and usually there is a large canister for the vacum. Could be that
    the maker is supplementing that with the vacum pump.


    --
    Dick #1349
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    ~Benjamin Franklin

    Home Page: dickcr.iwarp.com
    email:
     
    Dick C, Aug 2, 2004
    #5
  6. I've seen a couple of applications where a vacuum pump is used as part of a
    cruise control set up.

    John
     
    John West Berks, Aug 2, 2004
    #6
  7. -

    JazzMan Guest

    Imagine your surprise as your little lumbering beast is
    laboring up the long grade under full throttle, almost
    no vacuum available at this point, when some jackass
    comes blowing around the corner in your lane. You want
    to avoid a head on colision, but when you slam on the
    brakes there's no brakes because the engine hasn't
    returned to idle yet and hasn't had time to build up
    vacuum. Oops.

    JazzMan
    --
    **********************************************************
    Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net.
    Curse those darned bulk e-mailers!
    **********************************************************
    "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of
    supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to
    live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry
    **********************************************************
     
    JazzMan, Aug 2, 2004
    #7
  8. But the vacuum servo itself acts as a reservoir. Brakes of this type still
    work a couple of times after you stop the engine.
    Vacuum wipers are a different matter if you think about it - prolonged use
    under some conditions will exhaust any storage facility. Which is why no
    decent maker ever used them, and it's why no-one uses them today - despite
    vacuum still being used for other things.

    Some '50s Vauxhalls had mechanically driven wipers rather than electric.
    They just varied their speed with the engine...
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Aug 2, 2004
    #8
  9. -

    - Guest

    That's why the servo has a check valve. Full vacuum is generated in the
    servo almost instantly when the throttle is shut, and remains there in
    the absence of a faulty servo.

    The camshaft being too wild is another red-herring I suspect; modern
    cars have v.mild camshafts anyway otherwise they wouldn't pass stringent
    emissions requirements.

    As I said before, my car in particular has no other vacuum driven
    accessories. Indeed I used to a have a Carlton GSI 24v which used the
    vacuum for both operating an carbon canister and cruise control, which
    it did perfectly happily without a pump.

    OTTOMH, I can tell you that a 98 BMW 528i, 96 Nisan Almera 1.4, 96 Volvo
    T5, all get by without such a pump. It seems strange to add such a
    device which introduced another point of failure in the Braking system,
    causes a parasitic power loss, and must add significant cost to
    manufacture.

    Tom
     
    -, Aug 2, 2004
    #9
  10. -

    Dick C Guest

    - wrote in rec.autos.tech

    modern
    We are, of course, talking about a Citroen here. :).


    --
    Dick #1349
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
    deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    ~Benjamin Franklin

    Home Page: dickcr.iwarp.com
    email:
     
    Dick C, Aug 3, 2004
    #10
  11. -

    Steve Guest

    That's what the check-valve on the brake booster inlet line is for.
     
    Steve, Aug 3, 2004
    #11
  12. -

    JazzMan Guest

    Only an optimist would rely on that check valve to save
    their life by removing a factory-installed vacuum pump. :)

    I'm not an optimist.

    JazzMan
    --
    **********************************************************
    Please reply to jsavage"at"airmail.net.
    Curse those darned bulk e-mailers!
    **********************************************************
    "Rats and roaches live by competition under the laws of
    supply and demand. It is the privilege of human beings to
    live under the laws of justice and mercy." - Wendell Berry
    **********************************************************
     
    JazzMan, Aug 4, 2004
    #12
  13. I've not read that suggested here - have you?
    A vacuum pump can fail too.
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Aug 4, 2004
    #13
  14. -

    Richard Bell Guest

    Maybe it is just me, but I remember when power brakes were an option. In my
    experience, cars still stop when the brakes have no boost, you just have to
    push harder. The only reason I replaced the check valve in my '84 Dodge 600
    was that if I got too used to braking with no assist, I would have problems
    if I drove a different vehicle.
     
    Richard Bell, Aug 9, 2004
    #14
  15. When they were an option, brakes were of such a design that the amount of
    boost provided was small - usually drums. Modern ones multiply the effort
    by several times, and even the strongest person can't get near the same
    pressure.
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Aug 9, 2004
    #15
  16. -

    Nate Nagel Guest

    No decent maker? You mean Packard wasn't decent? (scoffs)

    of course, they did have an auxiliary vacuum pump on the oil pump
    (which caused other problems, but that's irrelevant to this
    discussion...) many other mfgrs. used vacuum wipers with an aux.
    vacuum pump on the fuel pump as well.

    nate
     
    Nate Nagel, Aug 9, 2004
    #16
  17. I wouldn't know - this is a UK group. But they don't stick in my mind as
    being great cars from what little I've heard of them.
    And how many do today? If it was so wonderful, they would still be in use.
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Aug 9, 2004
    #17
  18. -

    Steve Guest

    One of my cars weighs 4100 pounds and has MANUAL front disk/rear drum
    brakes. I prefer its brake feel to almost any other car I've ever
    driven. Manual brake setups (as opposed to power brakes with the boost
    disconnected) have a different mechanical ratio between the pedal travel
    and the master cylinder piston travel, and a different ratio between the
    master cylinder piston area and the total wheel cylinder piston area.

    Manual brakes require more pedal MOVEMENT (not necessarily more pressure
    at all). The extra movement allows finer driver control of braking
    effort, and they respond faster since there are inevitable delays
    (milliseconds) in the power booster as valves close and vacuum vents in
    order to modulate boost. But you do have to remember to lift your foot
    up higher before putting it on the brake pedal!
     
    Steve, Aug 9, 2004
    #18
  19. -

    Steve Guest

    That's about like someone asking sarcastically if I thought Bentley
    (back when it was really Bentley) wasn't decent, and me saying "this is
    a US group, I wouldn't know."

    Sheesh, Packard was one of the top 5 or so of all time. They're the ones
    that made many of the manufacturing changes that improved reliability of
    the Rolls-Royce Merlin during WWII, after all.
     
    Steve, Aug 9, 2004
    #19
  20. But will take for ever to stop from its top speed...
     
    Dave Plowman (News), Aug 9, 2004
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.